White v. Regester addressed redistricting in Texas and aimed to protect minority voting strength.

• A. It addressed school desegregation.
• B. It addressed criminal law.
• C. It addressed redistricting and minority voting rights.
• D. It addressed education funding.

Answer: (C)

The main concept is how drawing district lines can affect minority voting power and protect against vote dilution. White v. Regester looked at Texas redistricting and found that some legislative maps weakened the influence of minority voters, which violated equal protection. The Court’s ruling emphasized that districts should be drawn in a way that allows minority communities to influence election outcomes, shaping how subsequent redistricting is approached across states. It’s specifically about redistricting and minority voting rights, not about school desegregation, criminal law, or education funding.